Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences) ; (6): 244-250, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-843903

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the clinical effects of transverse tibial bone transport, interventional therapy and conventional therapy on diabetic foot. Methods: We selected 45 diabetic foot patients admitted to the research center from June 2016 to October 2018. We adopted the random number method and divided them into the interventional treatment group, transverse tibial bone transport group and conventional treatment group, with 15 patients in each. Patients in each group received routine clinical treatment, interventional treatment or lateral tibial transposition. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure and monitor the blood flow velocity of dorsal artery before and after treatment. Each group was recorded for the highest systolic blood pressure of the malleolus artery and the highest systolic blood pressure of the brachial artery to measure the malleolus brachial index (ABI), the skin temperature and pain VAS scores of the affected limbs and feet before and after surgery. The healing of ulcerated foot surface was observed before and after operation to evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects of these methods. Results: All the 45 patients were followed up for an average of 6.7 months (4-10 months). Compared with those in conventional treatment group, the postoperative ABI and the blood flow velocity of the dorsal artery in interventional treatment group and transverse tibial bone transport group were significantly better(P0.05). Conclusion: Compared with conventional basic treatment, transverse tibial bone transport and interventional treatment can significantly improve the blood flow parameters of diabetic foot patients, relieve the pain of the patients and promote the healing of ulcer surface. Transverse tibial bone transport is more effective, and its postoperative skin temperature and postoperative brachial-ankle index are better than those of interventional treatment.

2.
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery ; (12): 98-101, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-856412

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the effect of transverse tibial bone transport on the expression of angiogenesis-related growth factors in the serum of diabetic foot patients. Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2018, 10 patients who suffered from diabetes mellitus accompanied with Wagner stage 4 diabetic foot underwent transverse tibial bone transport. There were 5 males and 5 females with an average age of 59.2 years (range, 51-70 years). The duration of diabetes was 2-60 months, with an average of 24.2 months. The duration of diabetic foot was 30-120 days, with an average of 54.1 days. Peripheral venous blood was taken at 1 day before operation and at 1, 4, 11, 18, 28, and 35 days after operation. The serum was centrifuged and subjected to ELISA test to detect the expression levels of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). Results: The levels of serum VEGF, bFGF, and EGF increased rapidly at 11 days after operation, and the expression levels of the factors at 11, 18, 28, and 35 days were significantly higher than those before operation ( P<0.05). The expression level of PDGF increased suddenly at 18 days after operation, and the expression level of PDGF at 18, 28, and 35 days was significantly higher than that before operation ( P<0.05). Conclusion: Transverse tibial bone transport for the treatment of diabetic foot can significantly increase the expression of serum angiogenesis-related growth factors in early stage, which may be the mechanism of promoting the healing of diabetic foot wounds.

3.
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery ; (12): 23-27, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-856624

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of transverse tibial bone transport in treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Methods: Between June 2014 and December 2017, 17 patients with diabetic foot ulcer were treated. There were 11 males and 6 females, with a median age of 57 years (range, 46-72 years). The duration of diabetes was 2.4-32.0 years (mean, 16.0 years). According to the Wagner grading criteria, 7 cases were rated as grade 2, 8 cases as grade 3, and 2 cases as grade 4. The CT angiography (CTA) showed the arterial occlusion or stenosis of varying degrees below knee joint. All cases were treated with transverse tibial bone transport. Bone transport started at 3 to 5 days after placing external fixator and lasted 14 days (1 mm per day), and then reverse transport started. The total transport time was 28-30 days. Results: All 17 patients were followed up 5-12 months (mean, 8.5 months). During transportation, 4 cases had screw orifice infection, and 3 cases had liquefaction and seepage. And other 15 cases ulcers healed and the healing time was 35-72 days (mean, 48 days). There were significant differences in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, skin temperature, ankle brachial index (ABI) between before and after ulcer healed ( P<0.05). The CTA showed that the collateral circulation was established. The foot ulcer of 2 cases (Wagener grade 3 in 1 case and grade 4 in 1 case) still progressed after treatment, and amputation was performed. Conclusion: Transverse tibial bone transports has good effectiveness for diabetic foot ulcer.

4.
An. Facultad Med. (Univ. Repúb. Urug., En línea) ; 5(2): 130-140, dic. 2018. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BNUY, UY-BNMED | ID: biblio-1088686

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La transportación ósea se refiere al traslado de un fragmento de hueso a través de un defecto óseo, por distracción osteogénica. Objetivo: Describir la técnica quirúrgica con fijador externo AO, y evaluar los resultados de este tratamiento en defectos óseos diafisarios de tibia mayores de 4 cm, secundarios a fracturas expuestas graves o pseudoartrosis infectadas. Material y método: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de tipo serie de casos, retrospectivo, de los 14 pacientes tratados entre abril del 2011 y abril del 2015, con las lesiones o secuelas mencionadas en diferentes centro de Montevideo. Resultados: Todos los pacientes tenían secuelas a fracturas expuestas graves con defecto segmentario de tibia mayor a 4 cm. El seguimiento promedio fue de 13 meses (entre 6 y 27). La media de edad fue de 32 años (entre 15 y 53), la perdida ósea promedio 6,7 cm (entre 4 y 11), la velocidad de distracción de 0,58 mm/día, el período de distracción promedio fue de 92 días (entre 35 y 172), y el tiempo medio de fijadores externos desde el inicio fue de 194 días. Todos los pacientes requirieron algún procedimiento quirúrgico en el sitio de acoplamiento. Se logró la consolidación en 9 pacientes, hubo 2 pseudoartrosis, 2 pacientes abandonaron el tratamiento y uno decidió la amputación. No hubo ninguna recidiva de infección. Conclusión: La técnica de transportación ósea mediante el uso de fijadores externos AO, es una alternativa válida para el tratamiento de las perdidas óseas diafisarias de tibia con o sin infección.


Introduction: Bone transport is the slow transportation of the bone fragment along a bone defect, providing distraction osteogenesis. Objective: To describe the surgical technique of bone transport using the AO external fixator and to present the result of this procedure in tibial diafisis defects of more than 4 cm long, which were the result of severe open fractures or infected no unions. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective, descriptive study of 14 patients treated in several centers in Montevideo from April 2011 to April 2015. Results: The average age of the patients was 32 years (15-32), the average bone loss 6,7 cm (4-11), the distraction speed 0,58 mm/day, the mean distraction period 92 days (35-172) and the mean time external fixation was 194 days. The mean follow up was 13 months (6-27). All patients needed an additional surgical procedure in the docking site. Bone healing was accomplished in 9 patients and there were 2 no unions. There were 2 further patients who abandoned the treatment and another patient who requested amputation. At the latest follow up there was no recurrence of infection. Conclusion: Bone transport using AO external fixator, is a valid alternative for the treatment of segmental bone loss of the diafisis of the tibia with or without infection.


Introdução: O transporte ósseo é o transporte lento do fragmento ósseo ao longo de um defeito ósseo, que proporciona distração osteogênica. Objetivo: Descrever a técnica cirúrgica de transporte de osso, utilizando o fixador externo AO e apresentar o resultado deste procedimento nos defeitos da diáfise da tíbia de mais de 4 cm de comprimento, que foram um resultado de fracturas expostas graves ou ausência de juntas infectados. Material e métodos: Trata-se de um estudo descritivo e retrospectivo de 14 pacientes atendidos em diversos centros de Montevidéu no período de abril de 2011 a abril de 2015. Resultados: A idade média dos pacientes era de 32 anos (15-32), a 6,7 cm perda óssea média (4-11), a taxa de distracção 0,58 milímetros/dia, período médio de 92 dias distracção (35-172) e o tempo médio de fixação externa foi de 194 dias. O seguimento médio foi de 13 meses (6-27). Todos os pacientes precisaram de um procedimento cirúrgico adicional no local de encaixe. A cicatrização óssea foi realizada em 9 pacientes e não houve 2 articulações. Houve mais 2 pacientes que abandonaram o tratamento e outro paciente que solicitou a amputação. No último seguimento, não houve recidiva da infecção. Conclusão: O transporte ósseo utilizando o fixador externo AO é uma alternativa válida para o tratamento da perda óssea segmentar da diáfise da tíbia com ou sem infecção.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Bone Lengthening/methods , External Fixators , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Fracture Fixation/methods , Fractures, Ununited/surgery , Bone Diseases, Infectious , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery ; (12): 1261-1266, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-856685

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Ilizarov technique-based transverse tibial bone transport on the treatment of severe diabetic foot ulcer (Wagner grades 3 to 5) complicated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Methods: Between August 2014 and December 2017, 33 patients with severe diabetic foot and SIRS were treated with Ilizarov technique-based transverse tibial bone transport. There were 27 males and 6 females, with a mean age of 60.6 years (range, 34-79 years). All of them suffered from type 2 diabetes mellitus. The duration of diabetes was 1-28 years (mean, 10 years) and the duration of diabetic foot was 1-12 months (mean, 2.7 months). According to Wagner classification, there were 8 cases in grade 3, 23 cases in grade 4, and 2 cases in grade 5. The wound healing condition was observed after operation, and the limb salvage rate was calculated. The changes in body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein concentration were assessed. The skin temperature of the dorsum of the foot was measured, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the improvement of foot pain. Results: All 33 patients were followed up 3-30 months (mean, 14.1 months). All ulcers healed and the healing time was 3-12 months (mean, 5.3 months); the limb salvage rate was 100%. Postoperative body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein concentration were significantly lower than those before operation ( P<0.05). The skin temperature of the dorsum of the foot was (32.64±2.17)℃ at 1 month after operation, which was significantly improved when compared with preoperative value [(31.28±1.99)℃] ( t=0.05, P=0.00); but there was no significant difference in skin temperature compared with healthy side [(32.46±2.10)℃] ( t=2.04, P=0.41). The VAS score was 2.4±0.7 at 1 month after operation, which was significantly improved when compared with preoperative score (4.3±0.8) ( t=3.10, P=0.00). Conclusion : Ilizarov technique-based transverse tibial bone transport is an effective way to treat severe diabetic foot complicated with SIRS. It can promote foot ulcer healing and avoid amputations.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL